In this guide
Start with what the message actually says
A forwarded image can combine several claims: what happened, where it happened, when it happened and why. Check them separately. A genuine image does not automatically prove that the caption describes it accurately.
Ask your child to write the claim in one sentence. Then write what the image or message directly shows. Anything added beyond that is an interpretation to investigate.
Follow the claim back to its source
Look for the original publisher, date and full context rather than another copy of the same screenshot. For the school example, a parent should use the school's normal official communication route or the relevant issuing authority. Several forwards of one image are still one unverified source.
Check whether the source is in a position to know. A person who witnessed one school closing cannot establish that every school closed. The size of the claim determines what evidence would be enough.
- Write the exact claim without adding details.
- Look for the original notice or publication.
- Check who issued it, its date and the full text.
- Find independent confirmation when appropriate.
- Decide: supported, contradicted, or not verified yet.
Ask what else could explain what you see
A long queue outside a shop might mean a sale, a slow checkout or a special event. The queue alone does not tell you which explanation is right. Practise offering two plausible explanations before choosing one.
This habit does not mean every explanation is equally likely. Ask what extra observation would help distinguish them. A dated announcement, direct measurement or fuller photograph may change the conclusion.
References and further reading
- UNESCO: evaluating information sources
Background on assessing authors, sources and dates. The school-notice and queue exercises here are original fictional examples.
Try the learning experience.
Class 6–8 · critical thinking and media literacy · inspect the opening chapter and current course details.
Explore Thinking Explorer